IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1709 of 2025 1. Ayush Kumar aged about 27 Years S/O Lakho Singh @ Loko Singh 2. Lako Singh @ Loko Singh age about 49 years son of Jang Bahahdur Singh both R/O Village Chechar P.O. & P.S. Chechar District- Vaishali, Bihar … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ashish Kumar Son of Raja Ram Gupta Resident of Manaitand, Kumhar Patti PO+Ps- Dhansar District Dhanbad Jharkhand … opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda , Adv. For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.. PP 02 / 20.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with C.P. Case No. 15217 of 2023 registered under Sections 323, 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, cheated the complainant by receiving Rs. 50,000/- as advance for arranging a class IV job in the civil court, Patna. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the petitioner no.1 has already repaid Rs. 50,000/- taken by him to the complainant and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioners draws attention of the court to receipt showing the deposit of Rs. 50,000/- in the name of the complainant dated 20.03.2025. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner no. 2 has been implicated in this case only because he is the father of the petitioner no. 1. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Dhanbad in connection with C.P. Case No. 15217 of 2023 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not to annoy or disturb the complainant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-