Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010024832024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/72/2024 APARNA BHATTACHARJEE W/O- LATE KAUSHIK BHATTACHARJEE, VILL.- UTTAR HATKHALA, P.O.
KANAIBAZAR-788724, DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM VERSUS SMTI. SURANJANA SENAPATI THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GHY-781019. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B MALAKAR, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 10.04.2025
None appears for the petitioner on call. The present contempt petition has been instituted alleging violation of the directions passed by this Court vide order dated 19.06.2023, in WP(C) No. 1785/2020. This Court vide the said order directed to the respondent authorities to prepare the pension proposal
Page No.# 2/2 in respect of the husband of the petitioner after reconstruction of his service book. Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel appearing of the sole respondent, has submitted that the pension proposal in respect of the husband of the petitioner has already been prepared and the same was forwarded to the Director of Pension for disbursal of pension. He submits that the Director of Pension has already authorized to the petitioner herein, the pension and pensionary benefits required to be so authorized to her for the service rendered by her husband. In view of the above position, this Court is of the considered view that the directions passed vide the order dated 19.06.2023 in WP(C) No. 1785/2020 has since been complied with. Accordingly, the present Contempt Petition stands closed. The communications dated 02.04.2025, 27.02.2024 and 18.07.2024, placed on record by the Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, is kept on record and marked as ‘X’ collectively.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant