145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DEEPAK YADAV AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, HARKESH MANUJA 1. By way of present petition Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect life and liberty and property of petitioners and his other family members at the hands of respondent Nos.5 to 8. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P passing a speaking order expeditiously. 3. Prayer seems to be justified. 4. Upon advance notice, appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: DEEPAK YADAV AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Mukesh Yadav, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect life and liberty and property of petitioners and his other family members at the hands of respondent Nos.5 to 8. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would n case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P-8) moved at the instance of petitioner by passing a speaking order expeditiously. Prayer seems to be justified. Upon advance notice, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Ha appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6566-2025 Date of Decision: June 23, 2025 ........Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioners. Haryana. filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect life and liberty and property of petitioners and his other family members at the At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would n case direction is issued to the respondents to decide the at the instance of petitioner by Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners. 2025 June 23, 2025 Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the official respondents to protect life and liberty and property of petitioners and his other family members at the submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would decide the at the instance of petitioner by ryana appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6566-2025 -2- 5. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police, Rewari, to look into the representation (Annexure P-8) and take appropriate action in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 04 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. The aforesaid direction shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments made in the representation. 23.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document