PARINEETA TAK AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/23303/2025 · 2025-07-20
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70865 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117894 Court No. - 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 23303 of 2025 Applicant :- Parineeta Tak And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Avanish Kumar,Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Sri Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, which is taken on record. Shri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Rahul Pandey, learned brief holder for the State and Shri Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case No. 37445 of 2022 (Brijesh Gaur Vs. Parineeti Tak and others) as well as cognizance/summoning
order dated 11.12.2023, whereby learned magistrate took cognizance under Section 406, I.P.C., Police Station Vrindhavan, District Mathura, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C./Judicial Magistrate, Mathura.
Learned counsel for the both the parties fairly admits that the proceedings of complaint case and cognizance order have been quashed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Matter under Article 227 No. 6350 of 2025 vide order dated 8.7.2025, therefore, the case has become infructuous. The instant application is dismissed as infructuous accordingly.
Order Date :- 21.7.2025 T. Sinha Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad