2025:UHC:4585-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA 05TH JUNE, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/B) No. 306 OF 2025 M/s Shahid Construction. …Petitioner Versus Commissioner of the SGST and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents. : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. The facts are not in dispute. Both the counsels are at ad idem regarding the facts. Both the counsels submit that, in similar facts, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, while disposing of Writ Petition (S/B) No. 39/2025 vide order dated 24.02.2025, was pleased to hold and order as follows : “Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand through video conferencing. 3. Petitioner is a taxable person, registered under GST Act, 2017. His GST registration has been cancelled by Assistant Commissioner, Haridwar-Sector 3 vide order dated 12.03.2024. Challenging the cancellation order, petitioner has filed this Writ Petition. 1 2025:UHC:4585-DB 4. The show cause notice issued to the petitioner on 23.02.2024 reveals that cancellation has been ordered on account of petitioner’s failure to furnish GST returns for prescribed period. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon a judgment rendered by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3283 of 2024, whereby, petitioner in that case was permitted to make application for revocation of the cancellation order and the Competent Authority was directed to consider the application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a similar order be passed in the present case also. 7. Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder submits that she has no objection if petitioner is permitted to move appropriate application for revocation of cancellation order. 8. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to move an application for revocation of the cancellation order. If he makes such application within two weeks from today and also furnishes all the pending returns and deposits unpaid tax along with interest and amount of penalty, the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner’s prayer for revocation as per law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such application.” 3. Both the counsels submit that the instant petitioner also being similarly situated, as the petitioner in the aforesaid Writ Petition, the instant Writ Petition may also be disposed of on similar terms. 4. The submissions of both the counsels are placed on record. 5. The instant Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of relief granted in Paragraph No. 8 of the order dated 24.02.2025, rendered in Writ Petition (M/B) No. 39 of 2025. 2 2025:UHC:4585-DB 6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J. _____________ ALOK MAHRA, J. Dt: 05th June, 2025 Rahul 3 RAHUL PRAJAPA TI Digitally signed by RAHUL PRAJAPATI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=aa4fa3bee6691397758b14516ed3e66e61 bf4c848741983ed8c39e4145cf1dab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=303B55CC3063D34AC45BF8A192F CAD15C390A1AAD7B39857D2540AE4C28A4898, cn=RAHUL PRAJAPATI Date: 2025.06.06 15:08:10 +05'30'