[2025:RJ-JP:30051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2093/2002 Ms. Kamlesh Yadav D/o Shri L.S. Yadav, aged about 48 years, Resident of Village-Machrolli, Tehsil-Kishangarh Bas, Distt. Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary to the Government, Women & Child Development Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Women and Child Development Department, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 3. District Collector, Baran, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 05/08/2025 1. By way of filing instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that Your Lordships may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and:- (i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to make the payment of arrears as per Vth Pay Commission alongwith a interest of 24% per annum; (ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents be directed to make the payment of the encashment of Privileged Leave (P.L.) alongwith a interest of 24&% per annum; (iii) or any other appropriate relief may kindly be granted to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances in the present case; (iv) cost of the litigation may kindly be allowed to the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:30051] (2 of 2) [CW-2093/2002] 2. Bare perusal of memo of writ petition would reveal that the petitioner was appointed as a contractual employee and therefore, provisions of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Revised Pay Scale) Rules, 1998 are not applicable in the cases of contractual employees. Thus, the relief prayed by the petitioner is against the prevailing rules and misconceived. 3. Hence, no case for interference in the writ petition is made out and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /4