IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13878 of 2025 ====================================================== Raju Kumar Shrivastav @ Shrivastav Raju Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Shrivastava, Resident of Plot No. 424, Trmnt No. 7, Sagar Society, Ward No. 10, P.S.- Gandhidham, District- Kachchh, Gujrat- 370201, Permanent address- Resident of Village- Sareya Kahchari Tola, Post- Sareya Bajar, P.S.- Pahadpur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari. 3. The District Panchayati Raj Officer, Motihari, East Champaran, Motihari. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Areraj Sub-Division, District- East Champaran. 5. The Block Panchayati Raj Officer, Paharpur, District- East Champaran. 6. The Block Development Officer, Paharpur, District- East Champaran. 7. Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Sareya, Block Paharpur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.P. Gupta, G.P-10 Mr. Satya Vrat, A.C. to G.P. 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 02-09-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): (i) for direction to restrain the respondents not conduct panchayat bhawan upon a piece of land appertaining to surveyno. 5505/4, 5508 and 5499/4 Khata no. 691, Area 27 decimal, Tauji No. 951, Mauza-Saraiya, Block- Paharpur, Circle-Paharpur, District- East Champaran, Motihari which is raiyati land of the petitioner verified from khatiyan itself; (ii) for further direct that the respondent has not right to construct Patna High Court CWJC No.13878 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 panchayat bhawan upon the raiyati land of the petitioner. (iii). for grant of any other relief for which petitioner is entitled to get relief on the basis of facts as well as law both. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the respondent no. 2, the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari by filing a fresh petition/revenue receipt to show his bonafide. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that in that case, the matter after hearing shall be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court allows the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 2, the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari along with all the documents/supporting revenue documents to show his bonafide on the land in question. 7. Once the same is preferred in four weeks, the Collector, East Champaran, Motihari shall ensure that after hearing the parties and perusing the record, the matter is taken to its logical conclusion preferably by 31.03.2026. 8. The writ petition stands disposed of. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U