. I APHC010069092018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI Si'0 PRADESH HE MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT the HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS CIVIL MISCEI I ANFOUS APPFAI Mn.o.^r"nin Appeal Under Section 30 of W C Act ^ passed in W.C. N0.4 of 2015 dr20 10 2017 Between: Sriram General Insurance Manager, Visakhapatanam OF JUNE FIVE Company Limited, Represented by its General ■■■Appellant/Opposite Party AND 1- Dumpa Satyam, S/0 Laxmaiah (Late), Age.SOyrs 179/4, Laxmingar, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam 2. Dumpa Chandramma, Hindu, D.No.24- Satyam, D.No.24-179/4 Madhurawada, Visakapatnam District. 3. Dumpa Laxmana Rao Laxminagar, s/o Satyam, door Madhurawada, Viskhapatnam District. no.24-179/4, Laxminagar, -Respondent/Opposite Party No. 1 lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant interim stay of execution of the order passed in W.C.No. 4 of 2015, dt.20-10-2017 on the file of before the Commissioner For Employees Compensation Act and Assistant Commissioner Of Labour Circle- 1, Visakhaptnam pending disposal of CMA. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri C Buchi Reddy - no representation Counsel for the Respondents: Sri S A V Ratnam The Court made the following order: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS C.M.A.No.87 of 2018 JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed against the order, on the file of the Commissioner for Employees Compensation Act and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam District. dated 20.10.2017 in W.C.No.4 of 2015 Circle-1, 2. On 10.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was directed to be posted to 25.04.2024 the caption ‘for dismissal’. On 25.04.2025, I.A.No.2 of 2018 was allowed condoning the delay in filing the appeal and the matter under was posted to 23.06.2025. On 23.06.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant again and the matter was directed to be posted this day i 30.06.2025. i.e. on 3. Even on this day, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It spems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be order as to costs. 4. no As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- E. KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ^ ®f^P'oyees compensation act and Commissioner Of Labour Circle records if any) f ^ ^uchi Reddy Advocate 3. One CC to Sri. S A V Ratnam Advocate 4. The Section Officer, VR Section Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Assistant -I, Visakhapatnam District (with [OPUC] [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at AL HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER CMA NO. 87 OF 2018 I 2 5 SEP 2025 . Current Section . o> m: DISMISSING THE CMA FOR DEFAULT