Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110771 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23913 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Sahu,Praveen Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0313 of 2024, under Sections 85, 80, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Islam Nagar, District Budaun, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the FIR is delayed by about two days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. The informant is panch witness no.1 in the inquest proceedings, which were complete on 16.10.2024 at about 9:05 p.m. itself, as such, it is a clear-cut case of false implication. The FIR has been instituted after legal consultation. There is no whisper of a single word at the time of recording of the said inquest proceedings. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that the demand of buffalo and golden chain is vague. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 09.11.2024 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the delay in institution of FIR and the fact that the informant is panch witness no.1 in the inquest proceedings and has not whispered a single word at that time, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Ravendra Kumar, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 (Ravi Kant) (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad