IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13895 of 2015 ====================================================== Indu Devi wife of Manoj kumar Singh Resident of Villag-e Sihula ,Police Station-Khutauna, District Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga. 3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani. 4. The Sub-Divisional officer, Phulparas, Madhubani. 5. The Cirlce officer, Khutauna, District Madhubani. 6. The officer-incharge Police Station ,Khatauna, District Madhubani. 7. Ghuran Roy son of late Maksudan Roy 8. Ratan Roy son of Ghuran Roy 9. Bouya lal Roy son of late Khublal Roy 10. Bhupesh Roy son of Bouya lal Roy 11. Bechan Roy son of Bouya lal Roy 12. Sanjay Roy s/o Bouya Lal Roy 13. Tejilal Roy son of Sri Maksudan Roy 14. Budh Narayan Roy@Budha Roy son of Shri Teji Lal Roy 15. Lal Roy S.o Tejilal Roy All Sl. No. 7 to 15 are Residents of Village- Sihula, P.s. KLutumba, District Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. M. Kumar, AC to GP-20 For the Resp. Nos. 7-15 : Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, Advocate Mr. Hriday Narayan Harshit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 8 03-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Respondent No. 7 to 15. 2. Persuant to the direction of this Court dated 04.05.2018, passed in the present writ proceeding, the District Patna High Court CWJC No.13895 of 2015(8) dt.03-04-2025 2/2 Magistrate, Madhubani has filed a supplementary counter affidavit stating therein that encroachment over the land in question has been removed by the authority concerned in the presence of the petitioner, respondent nos. 7 to 15 and the Gram Panchayat. The counter affidavit is filed long back in 2018 and learned counsel for the petitioner has received the same on 06.09.2018 and till date, he has not filed any rejoinder to the supplementary counter affidavit which suggest that the encroachment over the land in question has been removed by the authority concerned. 3. In view of the aforesaid, this writ application stands disposed of. priyanka/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U