Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70799 (KAR)

C.N HANUMANTHARAYAPPA v. SRI. H S RAVISHANKAR

WP/10666/2025 · 2025-08-18

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31958 WP No. 10666 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 10666 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. C.N HANUMANTHARAYAPPA S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 2. SMT. THIPPAMMA W/O BALAKRISHNA T H, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 3. T B YOGESHA S/O BALAKRISHNA T H AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS 4. T B ADITYA S/O BALAKRISHNA T H AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 5. VARALAKSHMI @ VARALAKSHMMA D/O LATE NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT M M A KAVAL VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBALI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572 117. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B G VIJAYA KUMARA SWAMY., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31958 WP No. 10666 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. H S RAVISHANKAR S/O H S SHIVALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT HEBBAKA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBALI, TUMKUR DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572106. 2. SRI BALAKRISHNA T H S/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT M M A AVAL VILLAGE, CHELUR HOBALI, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT, PIN CODE NO.-572117. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT GUBBI ON I.A.NO.1 FILED U/O 39 RULE 1 AND 2 BY THE PLAINTIFF IN O.S.NO.346/2024 DATED 20.12.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners calls in question the order passed allowing the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, after hearing both the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31958 WP No. 10666 of 2025 parties and the said order is in detail. Therefore, there is no warrant to entertain the subject petition. 2. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appeal under Order XLIII Rule of Code of Civil Procedure, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 271