Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116484 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8858 of 2025 Petitioner :- Madan Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Shankar Singh,Anil Kumar Singh,Jagdish Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Pooja Agarwal Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following reliefs:-
"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the impugned office order dated 28.11.2024 with Ref. No. IIT(BHU)/ ADM/ 04/ DPC/ Technical / 10495 issued by registrar [Annexure no.9] by which 10 employees are illegally promoted against provisions to section 2.7.3 (b) of Recruitment and Promotion Norms-2019 from Level-9 and Level-8 to the post of Technical Officer [Level- 10] as well as the impugned notice dated 18.11.2024 with Ref. No. IIT(BHU)/ ADM/4/DPC/ Technical/ 10219 issued by Joint Registrar [Administration]- 1 (Annexure no.7) II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of ad interim mandamus commanding the respondent authority to recommend the names of employees as fresh from Level-9 and Level-8 through promotion to the post of 13 existing Technical Officer [Level-10] according to provisions of section 2.7.3(b) of Recruitment and Promotion norms, 2019 considering fitness-cum seniority as well as Reservation Roster for promotion."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 6 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 6 and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for respondent nos.2 to 6.
The petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.3, Director, Indian Institute of Technology, B.H.U., Varanasi within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.3 is directed to pass appropriate detailed and reasoned order on the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad