Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70775 (ORI)

BHABANANDA MAZUMDAR v. SHASHIKANT MISHRA,SENIOR DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER,FA AND CAO,E.CO. RAILWAY

CONTC/4564/2025 · 2025-10-10

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.4564 of 2025 Bhabananda Mazumdar ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Debadatta Mohanty -versus- Shashikant Mishra,senior Divisional Finance Manager,fa And Cao,e.co. Railway ..... Opposite Party Represented By Adv. – P.K. Parhi, D.S.G.I. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 10.10.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. 3. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging non-implementation of the Court’s order dated 24.06.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.16509 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that although the order dated 24.06.2025 was duly communicated vide a postal receipt under Annexure-3 to the contempt application. However, same has not been implemented. As such, it is alleged that the conduct of the Opposite Party-Contemnor is construed as an act of wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s direction. Page 2 of 2. 5. Learned counsel for the Contemnor on the other hand sought for some time to implement the order passed by this court in the event the same has attained finality. 6. Considering the request made by the learned counsel for the Contemnor, this Court deems it proper to provide another opportunity to the Contemnor as a last chance and the Contempt Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Opposite Party- Contemnor to comply with the direction of this Court dated 24.06.2025 passed in W.P.(C) No.16509 of 2025, if the same has attained finality in the meantime, within a period of eight weeks from the date of service of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioner, provided the operation of order has not been stayed by higher forum and file compliance report before the Registry of this Court within one week thereafter. It is made clear that in the event the order of the Court is not given effect to within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be construed to be wilful and deliberate violation of this Court’s order. 7. The CONTC is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer