Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70770 (MAD)

A.MURUGESAN v. COMMISSIONER

WP/24652/2025 · 2025-07-29

Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.24652 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.07.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP No.24652 of 2025 A.Murugesan : Petitioner versus 1. Commissioner, Land and Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2. The District Collector, Kallakurichi District. 3. The District Revenue Officer, Kallakurichi. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Kallakurichi. 5. Tashildar, Chinnasalem Taluk Office, Kallakurichi. 6. Dhanapakkiam 7. Kandasamy 8. Chinnammal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.24652 of 2025 9. Pappathi 10.Kumar 11.Ganapthy 12.Supparayan 13.Gandhi 14.Solaimuthu 15.Manimegalai 16.Selvaraj : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 5 to consider the order passed by this Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.No.18693 of 2021 dated 7.9.2021, W.P.No.4136/2023 dated 13.02.2023, W.P.No.220/2024 dated 22.10.2024, consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 to remove the encroachments made by respondents 6 to 16. For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Subramani For Respondents : Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar State Govt. Pleader Asst. by Mr.Habeeb Rahman, Govt. Advocate for RR 1 to 5 * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This petition is not maintainable, as the relief sought in the petition has already been granted in the earlier round of litigation. It https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.24652 of 2025 appears that earlier, when the contempt petition was filed, the same was disposed of keeping in view that the appeal was pending before the authority. After the appeal was dismissed, a writ petition was again filed before the Court, wherein an interim order was passed. That order has now been vacated on 08.04.2025. Even thereafter, if the order of the Court is not being complied with, it would be a matter of contempt. With the liberty to file contempt petition, this petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ.)(MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.) 29.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sra To 1. Commissioner, Land and Administration Department, 2nd Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. Page 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.24652 of 2025 2. The District Collector, Kallakurichi District. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.24652 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR , J. (sra) 3. The District Revenue Officer, Kallakurichi. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Kallakurichi. 5. Tashildar, Chinnasalem Taluk Office, Kallakurichi. WP No.24652 of 2025 29.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis