APHC010068912020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 480/2020 Between: 1. PAMIJENNI SUBBA REDDY, S/O. NARASAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. KOTHAPALLI VILLAGE, GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. KATHERAPALLI SUBBARATHAMMA,, W/O. OBULA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PRASANTHI NAGAR, GIDDALUR VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MORE RAJYA LAKSYHMI, W/O. SRIRAMULU REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PODILI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. PAMIJENNI PEDA YALLAMMA DIED, A 3. PAMIJENNI CHINA YELLAMMA, W/O. CHINNA NARASAIAH, ARDAVEEDU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. DAMIREDDY NARAYANAMMA, , W/O. BALI REDDY, MADALAVARIPALEM VILAGE, PODILI MANDAL. 5. DONAPATI ESWARA REDDY, S/O. POLICE REDDY, R/O. KOTHAPALLI, GIDDALUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. ANNAPUREDDY MADHAVI, , W/O. RAMA SWAMY REDDY, R/O.GIDDALUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. DONAPATI PADMA, W/O. ESWARA REDDY, R/O. GIDDALUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. BALAGANI PEDDA SRINU DIED, A 9. BALAGANI VENKATESWARLU ALIAS SRINU, , S/O. PANDAVULU, R/O. THADEPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. BALAGANI PEDDA OBULU, , S/O. PANDAVULU, R/O. TADEPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 11. BALAGANI CHINNA OBULU, S/O. PANDAVULU, R/O. GUDIVARIVARIVEEDI, VIJAYAWADA. 12. BALAGANI NARASIMHA RAO, , S/O. PANDAVULU, R/O. THADEPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 13. BALAGANI CHANTI, S/O. PANDAVULU, R/O. THADEPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 14. KANAKAM VENKATESWARLU, , S/O. PEDDA BALAIAH, R/O. THADEPALLI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 15. BALAGANI CHINNA NAGAIAH, S/O. CHINNA LAKSHMI NARASAIAH, R/O. THADEPALL VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 16. BALAGANI PEDDA NAGAIAH, S/O. CHINNA LAKSHMI NARASAIAH, R/O. THADEPALL VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 17. NUGGU DHANAMMA PEMMANI DHANAMMA, W/O. OBULESU ALIAS NALLA SUBBAIAH, R/O, PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 18. PEMMANI VENKATA SUBAMMA ALIAS PULLAMMADIED, A 19. MURAKA VENKATESWARLUDIED, A 20. MURAKA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, R/O. PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 21. GUNTURI AUDILAKSHAMMA, , W/O. LATE BANGARU REDDY, R/O. PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 22. GUNTURI BRAHMANANDA REDDY, , S/O. LATE BANGARU REDDY, R/O.PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 23. GUNTURI SRIN VASULA REDDY, , S/O. LATE BANGARU REDDY, R/O.K.K. MITTAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 24. GUNTURI NAGI REDDY, S/O. LATE BANGARU REDDY, R/O.BACHALAKUR3PADU, KK MITTAL. 25. BONAM PARVATHI, W/O. LATE BANGAN REDDY, R/O. KK MITTAL. 26. PALLERLA ESWARAMMA, , W/O. VENKATESWARLU, R/O. POTHAVARAM, PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 27. BALAGANI SUSEELA, , W/O. LATE PEDDA SRINU, R/O. PODILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 28. BALAGANI RAVI KUMAR, , S/O.LATE PEEDA SRINU, R/O.PODDILI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 29. VEERAMREDCY PULLAMMA, W/O. CHINNA VEERAM REDDY, R/O. MADALAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, PODILI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 30. VEERAM VER KATA REDDY, , S/O. APPI REDDY, R/O. MADALAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, PODILI DISTRICT, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 31. MEENIGA CHINA OBULA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, R/O. D.NO.3-12, MADALAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, PODDILI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. (RES.NO.2 TO 28 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES). ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toMemorandum of grounds before this Hon'ble Court aggrieved order and Decree passed in I.A.No.686/2019 in O.S.No.54 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Darsi, dated 18-01-2020 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.54 of 2009 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Darsi pending the Civil Revision Petition before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAJA REDDY KONETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the order dated 18.01.2020 passed in I.A.No.686 of 2019 in O.S.No.54 of 2009 on the file of Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Darsi. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Sri. Y. Shashank, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri. Koneti Raja Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed this Court that the cause in the present petition would not survive for further adjudication and that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 12.08.2025 GSS