Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70765 (PNJ)

SHIVANI AND ANOTHER v. UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/6550/2025 · 2025-06-20

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6550-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6550-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 20.06.2025 Shivani … Petitioner Versus UT Chandigarh and others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. PP UT, Chandigarh. *** Sandeep Moudgil, J. 1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to official respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 & 5. 2. Notice of motion. 3. Mr. Alankrit Bhardwaj, Addl. PP UT, Chandigarh, present in Court on advance copy, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, who assures the Court that necessary action will be taken on the representation dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, by passing a speaking order within a period of three days from today, in the light of Standard Operating Procedure bearing No.2385-2450/UT/HAC dated 27.02.2025. 4. In light of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the instant petition any further. RAJAN KUMAR 2025.06.20 21:16 I am approving this document CRWP-6550-2025(O&M) 2 5. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure as per law, in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. 6. Dismissed as not pressed. ( Sandeep Moudgil ) Judge 20.06.2025 Rajan Whether speaking / reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RAJAN KUMAR 2025.06.20 21:16 I am approving this document