IN T 208 Sudarshana Amit Arora CORAM: Present: NIDHI GU order dated this Court Consumer whereby the was directe expeditiousl from the dat issued by th the executio Redressal C COCP-112-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.112 of Date of decision : rshana Batra Versus Arora AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ranjeet S. Chauhan, Advoc for the petitioner. Mr. Govind Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.2-HSVP. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 18.07.2024 (Annexure P-1) passe ourt in CWP-14616-2024 titled as “S umer Disputes Redressal Commissio by the District Consumer Disputes Redr directed to decide Execution Applic itiously as possible and preferably wit the date fixed before it. A perusal of the aforesaid ord by the writ Court was essentially to en ecution proceedings pending before the ssal Commission, Faridabad. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 12 of 2025 (O & M) sion :-11.05.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA Advocate ocate for respondent No.1. has been filed alleging violation of ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of as “Sudarshna Batra vs. District mission, Faridabad and others”, s Redressal Commission, Faridabad Application No. 79 of 2023 as ly within a period of four months id order shows that the direction y to ensure expeditious disposal of ore the District Consumer Disputes VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.14 08.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits tha the District came to be a the appeal p Disputes R 24.03.2025. order, the re before the N presently pe the aforesai of CWP-14 Execution A came to be p It ha respondents 1889-2025, Against the Diary No. 7 others vs. S Court, in w “…the resp Redressal C expeditiousl pursuant to COCP-112-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel appearing on its that the petitioner had initially filed istrict Consumer Disputes Redressal Co to be allowed vide order dated 21.03.202 peal preferred by the respondents befor tes Redressal Commission stood d .2025. Learned counsel further submi , the respondents have already filed Sec e the National Consumer Disputes Red ntly pending adjudication. It is also subm oresaid proceedings, the petitioner had a 14616-2024 seeking a direction tion Application No. 79 of 2023, where to be passed. It has further been brought to the n ndents had challenged the order dated 2025, which came to be dismissed v st the same, the respondents have filed S No. 75464 of 2025 titled as “Haryana S . Sudarshana Batra and another” b , in which, vide order dated 02.2.202 respondents make a prayer to the N sal Commission to decide the Second iously as possible”. Learned counsel for the respo ant to the aforesaid observations mad 2 ng on behalf of the respondents filed a consumer complaint before sal Commission, Faridabad, which .03.2023. It is further submitted that before the learned State Consumer od dismissed vide order dated submits that against the aforesaid econd Appeal No. 257 of 2025 s Redressal Commission, which is submitted that during pendency of r had approached this Court by way ction for expeditious disposal of wherein the order dated 18.07.2024 the notice of this Court that the dated 18.07.2024 by filing LPA- sed vide order dated 07.07.2025. filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) yana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and her” before the Hon’ble Supreme .2.2026, it has been directed that the National Consumer Disputes cond Appeal No.257 of 2025 as respondents further submits that s made by the Hon’ble Supreme VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.14 08.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Court, an National Co stated to be counsel for deliberate d when the m Consumer D moving forw record the before the expeditious Consumer D is now fixe Redressal C issued. May 11, 202 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-112-2025 (O & M) , an appropriate application has alrea nal Consumer Disputes Redressal Comm to be fixed for final arguments on 25.05 This Court has considered the s el for the parties and perused the record. At this stage, it cannot be said rate disobedience of the order passed b the matter is presently pending consi umer Disputes Redressal Commission an ng forward for final adjudication. The res d the subsequent developments includi e the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the itious disposal of the second appeal p umer Disputes Redressal Commission. In view of the above facts, and w fixed for final arguments before the ssal Commission on 25.05.2026, no furt Accordingly, the present contem Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 3 already been moved before the Commission and the matter is now 25.05.2026. the submissions made by learned ecord. e said that there is any wilful or ssed by the writ Court, particularly consideration before the National ion and proceedings are stated to be he respondents have also placed on ncluding pendency of proceedings d the directions issued therein for peal pending before the National ion. , and since the second appeal itself e the National Consumer Disputes o further direction is required to be ontempt petition is disposed of. any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.14 08.23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document