Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7075 (AP)

Gangireddy Parama Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3747/2025 · 2025-05-01

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010068752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 3747 OF 2025 Between: 1. GANGIREDDY PARAMA REDDY,, SON OF SIVA REDDY, AGED 50 YEARS. RESIDENT OF DOOR NO. 5-151/A, ANKAMMA TEMPLE STREET, PRATHIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR, DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 4. THE PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, PRATHIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PRATHIPADU POLICE STATION, PRATHIPADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ELURU SESHA MAHESH BABU 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR HOME 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Eluru Sesha Mahesh Babu, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Panuku Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development and Sri P.A.K. Yadav, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudhir, Ld. Standing Counsel for the ZPPs, MPPs, Grama Panchayats. 2. Sri P.A.K. Yadav, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Sudhir, Ld. Standing Counsel for the ZPPs, MPPs, Grama Panchayats has submitted the Written Instructions dated 30.04.2025 furnished by the Panchayat Secretary, Grama Panchayat, Prathipadu, Prathipadu (M). Copy of it is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The relevant portion of the Written Instruction is usefully extracted hereunder: “It is submitted that the respondent not interfering with the property of petitioner in Sy.No.761/A situated in 10th ward Prathipadu Village and Mandal Guntur District. This respondent did not issues any notice to the petitioner and not taking steps to disposes from the property in question. And not going to construct cement platform in the subject property.” 4. Having noted the above extract, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition at the admission stage without going into merit directing the Official Respondents to follow the due process of law, if any such proposal is to be implemented, in the future. 3 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 01.05.2025 MNR 4 82 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.3747 OF 2025 Dt: 01.05.2025 Mnr