Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70745 (PNJ)

KAJAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6564/2025 · 2025-06-23

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

143 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KAJAL STATE OF HARYANA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Jagdish Kumar Kaundal, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA 1. By way of present petition prayer has been made for issuance of direction and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 8. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P passing a speaking order expeditiously. 3. Prayer seems to be justified. 4. Upon advance notice, appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the p 5. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Jagdish Kumar Kaundal, Advocate for Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed prayer has been made for issuance of direction protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 8. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to representation (Annexure P-2) moved at the instanc passing a speaking order expeditiously. Prayer seems to be justified. Upon advance notice, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6564-2025 Date of Decision: June 23, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Jagdish Kumar Kaundal, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. filed under Article 226 CrPC, prayer has been made for issuance of directions to respondent Nos.2 protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be satisfied in case direction is issued to the respondents to decide the at the instance of petitioner by Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the etitioner. In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed 2025 June 23, 2025 CrPC, .2 protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of pressing the present petition on merits, his client would be decide the e of petitioner by Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana appears on behalf of respondents and raises no objection to the In view of the agreed stand taken by both sides, but without going into the merits of the controversy, the present petition is disposed TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6564-2025 -2- of with a direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Ambala to look into the representation (Annexure P-2) and take appropriate action in accordance with law by passing a speaking order preferably within a period of 04 (four) weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. The aforesaid direction shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the averments made in the representation. 23.06.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.06.23 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document