NARENDRA SINGH YADAV v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/8907/2025 · 2025-07-07
Ajit Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70738 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107734 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8907 of 2025 Petitioner :- Narendra Singh Yadav Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alka Srivastava,Pranab Kumar Ganguli Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has questioned the order of transfer dated 14.06.2025 in violation of transfer policy.
3. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner though has submitted joining pursuant to the order of transfer at the transferred place but his claim can be directed to be considered by the competent authority, namely, respondent No. 2 against the transfer order.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in the event petitioner is directed to make representation afresh ventilating his grievances.
5. In view of above, this petition stands disposed of with the direction to the petitioner to make representation afresh before the respondent No. 2 within a period of two weeks from today raising all his grievances against the transfer order which shall be considered and disposed of by means of a reasoned and speaking
order by the respondent No. 2 within a further period of four weeks strictly in accordance with the provisions as contained in the transfer policy enforced by the State Government and shall not be influenced by the joining of the petitioner under the order of transfer.
Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad