05.02.2025 110 sdas Rejected C.R.M. (A) No. 269 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Haldia Police Station Case No. 146 of 2024 dated 24.09.2024 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/126(2) /3(5) of the BNS wherein charge-sheet submitted under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/126(2)/3(5) of the BNS. And In Re : Shib Sankar Das @ Shibsankar Das & Anr. .….. petitioners Mr. Navanil De Mr. Subhrajit Dey ..…for the petitioners Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Santanu Talukdar ….. for the State 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits there was prior enmity between the parties. Earlier criminal cases were registered against the de facto complainant and her husband. They pray for anticipatory bail. 2. Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 3. We have considered the materials on record. Though there was prior enmity between the parties statements of witnesses disclose that petitioners had brutally assaulted the victim resulting in serious fracture injuries. Ocular version is corroborated by medical evidence. Accordingly, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Subhendu Samanta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)