Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70707 (KAR)

SMT. ARCHANA SHASHIDHARA v. SHRUTHI CREATIONS

WP/4479/2023 · 2025-09-01

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34151 WP No. 4479 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 4479 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ARCHANA SHASHIDHARA W/O SHASHIDHARA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 2. SRI SHASHIDHARA S/O. LATE D.R.RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.76, 18TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, B.S.K. 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE-560050. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G.K. SHIVA PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRUTHI CREATIONS ART SILKS AND PURE SILK SAREES, SITUATED AT NO.25, KAILESH COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34151 WP No. 4479 of 2023 NEAR D.K. MARKET, KEMPANNA LANE, BANGALORE-560002. REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.K.S.DARSHA S/O T. SETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DEVANANDA I., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORD IN THE O.S.NO.1261/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (EXCLUSIVE DEDICATED COMMERCIAL COURT AT BENGALURU (CCH.88). DIRECTION IN THE NAME OF THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DT 10.02.2023 PASSED ON I.A. NO.3 IN THE O.S. NO. 1261/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXXVII ADDL. CITY AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (EXCLUSIVE DEDICATED COMMERCIAL COURT AT BENGALURU (CCH.88) AT ANNX-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34151 WP No. 4479 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The undersigned petitioners had filed the above petition challenging the rejection of application IA no 3 filed under Order 26 Rule 10A in Com Os No 1261/2022 before the Hon'ble CCH 88(Commercial Court). The petitioners herein and the respondent have settled the Com Os no 1261/2022 before the Lok Adalath by way of recording the compromise petition before the Hon'ble CCH 88. It is therefore prayed that above writ petition may be disposed off as not pressed in view of the settlement between the petitioners and the Respondent herein in the ends of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 3 Sl No.: 15 CT:BHK