NEHA SHARMA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/20987/2021 · 2025-07-30
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70698 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70698 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 243
CWP-20987-2021
Date of decision: 30.07.2025
NEHA SHARMA AND OTHERS
......Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
.......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
*****
Present: - Mr. Inder Pal Goyat, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
Ms. Komal Klana, Advocate and
Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate for
Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate
for respondent-HPSC.
***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
Challenge in the present writ petition is to the impugned order dated 17.08.2021 whereby case of the petitioners for considering their claim for appointment to the unfilled posts of Horticulture Development Officer pursuant to Advt. No. 5(xiii), dated 29.12.2018, has been rejected.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that in view of the reply filed by the respondents, he seeks withdrawal of the instant writ petition so as to file an appropriate petition, if so advised, to VISHAL SHARMA 2025.08.02 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-20987-2021
-2-
challenge the different clauses of the Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) and Allied Services and Other Common/Combined Examination Act, 2002 and the Rules.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-HPSC has no objection to the same.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 30, 2025
JUDGE Vishal Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable
: Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.08.02 13:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document