Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70696 (PNJ)

SOHAN SINGH AND ANR. v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/16879/2023 · 2025-07-29

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 267 CWP-16879-2023 (O&M). Date of Decision: 29.07.2025. Sohan Singh and another ....Petitioners. VERSUS State of Punjab and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, Assistant Advocate Genral, Punjab. Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate and Mr. Saksham Khunger, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there was widespread encroachment on the 120 feet wide road in Development Scheme of 110 Acres known as Guru Teg Bahadur Nagar, Jalandhar and it was removed by the respondents but the same has been once again encroached upon. The encroachment on the road is preventing access of the residents to the schools, hospitals etc. He has referred to the photographs at Annexure P-10. Heard. JITENDER 2025.07.29 18:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CWP-16879-2023 (O&M) -2- In view of the limited prayer, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to remove the above said encroachment within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 29.07.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.07.29 18:08 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC