Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.2438 & 2442 of 2025 Date of decision: 12.03.2025
1. CWP No.2438 of 2025 Vatika Bhardwaj.
...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Ors.
...Respondents.
2. CWP No.2442 of 2025 Amit Kumar Verma.
...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Ors.
...Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate
General,
for respondents No.1 to 3-State. : Mr. V.B. Verma, Central Government
Counsel,
for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these writ petitions have been rendered infructuous, as the petitioners have not qualified in the selection process in question. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
2. In view of above, these writ petitions are disposed have been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 12th March, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)