ca10130.13 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10130 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18464/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Sainath Tukaram Kotalwar And Another ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10129 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18460/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Vijaykumar Rangnath Kotalwar And Another ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10131 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18464/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Sainath Tukaram Kotalwar And Another ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10133 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18451/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Kishan Kalu Chavan And Others ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10128 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18460/2013 The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Vijaykumar Rangnath Kotalwar And Another … AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10132 OF 2013 IN/WITH FAST/18451/2013 2025:BHC-AUG:30386 ca10130.13 -2- The State of Maharashtra And Another VERSUS Kishan Kalu Chavan And Others ... A.G.P. for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Jadhav Advocate for Respondents-claimants : Mr. H.B. Nandgavle h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 6th NOVEMBER 2025 PER COURT :- 1. These are the applications for condonation of delay of 100 days caused in filing the first appeals. 2. Perused the applications and heard learned advocates for the respective parties. Learned advocate for the respondents- claimants strongly objected the applications. Considering the reasons stated in the applications, it appears that the delay is not deliberate, therefore, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned in the interest of justice. 3. In first appeals, issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Nandagavle h/f Mr. Sakolkar, learned advocate, waives notice for the respective respondents-claimants. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/