HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 20984 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Arun Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anadi Krishna Narayana, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition with prayed to quash the order dated 27.03.2025 passed by respondent no.1,Additional District Magistrate, Finance and Revenue, Allahabad, copy of which has been appended as Annexure-6 to the writ petition. 3. Today when the matter is taken up, preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents that against the aforesaid order, statutory alternative remedy is available to the petitioners to file appeal before the Debt Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction as provided under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. 4. This fact is also admitted by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of statutory alternative remedy. October 6, 2025 Deepika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Mishra, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Saraswati Automobiles .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Magistrate And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad