Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70663 (ALL)

AJAY KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIA/8884/2025 · 2025-07-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107665 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8884 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:- " I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the Respondent No.2 i.e. Director Higher Education, Uttar Pradesh at Prayagraj to decide the Representation dated 28.4.2025 of the Petitioner pending before him [filed as Annexure No.6 to this Writ Petition] П. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the Respondent authority to regularize the services of the Petitioner on the post of Clerk in the institution namely Kamla Maheshwari Arya Kannya Post Graduate College, District Mirzapur." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri R. P. Tiwari, learned Standing counsel for the State- respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Director Higher Education, Uttar Pradesh, Prayagraj within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 8.7.2025 AKT (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad