Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7066 (JHR)

MOST LALITA DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./689/2023 · 2025-02-28

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 689 of 2023 ------ Most. Lalita Devi, aged about 45 years, Wife of Late Umesh Kumar Gupta, Resident of Ravindra Path, Ekpatiya Mohalla, P.S. Bara Bazar Top-1 (Sadar) P.O. Sadar, District- Hazaribagh … … Petitioner -Versus - 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajiv Lochan Prabhakar, Son of Kamta Singh, Resident of Flat No. 3E, Yash Enclave, Don Bosco School Road, Hesag, P.O. Hatia, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi ... … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Hemant Kr Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : M/s. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : M/s. Pran Pranay, Advocate ----- 06/28.02.2025 Heard the parties Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed this application for quashing of order dated 27.01.2023 passed in A.B.P. No. 67 of 2023 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Hazaribagh, whereby and wherein, the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Hazaribagh allowed the Anticipatory Bail of the Opposite Party No.2 in Complaint Case No. 1630 of 2018, registered under Section 420, 406, 323, 341, 120(B), 354(B) of the I.P.C. Mr. Hemant Kr Shikarwar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that as the parties had already settled their dispute, he does not want to press this application for cancellation of Anticipatory Bail granted to the Opposite Party No.2. In view of the aforesaid facts, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded