CWP- 17383 105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT YOGESH BHADANA STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM:- Present: ANIL KSHETARPAL 1. Certiorari Faridabad. 2. internal communication sent by Deputy Commissione DCF, Faridabad reference to the order Appeal No.10294 of 2013 titled as “ Divesh Bhutani and others 1 17383-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH YOGESH BHADANA Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Mr.Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl.A.G., Haryana with Mr.Divyanshu Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash order passed on 14.06.2025 by Deputy Commissioner, . It is evident that the communication dated 14.06.2025 is an internal communication sent by Deputy Commissione DCF, Faridabad-cum-Chairman of the Committee. Moreover there is reference to the orders passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court Appeal No.10294 of 2013 titled as “Narinder Singh and others Divesh Bhutani and others” on 21.07.2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- 17383-2025 Date of Decision:- 17.06.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent(s) ANIL KSHETARPAL VIKRAM AGGARWAL , Advocate Mr.Sanjeev Kaushik, Addl.A.G., Haryana with Mr.Divyanshu Kaushik, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of .2025 by Deputy Commissioner, It is evident that the communication dated 14.06.2025 is an internal communication sent by Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad to Chairman of the Committee. Moreover there is passed by Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Civil Narinder Singh and others Vs. 21.07.2022. 2025 17.06.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent(s) The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of .2025 by Deputy Commissioner, It is evident that the communication dated 14.06.2025 is an r, Faridabad to Chairman of the Committee. Moreover there is in Civil Vs. SUDHIR KUMAR 2025.06.18 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP- 17383-2025 3. Hence, as of now, no order has been passed against the petitioner which may have given a cause of action for filing the instant writ petition. Consequently, we do not find any reason to entertain the instant writ petition at this stage. 4. Disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE 17.06.2025 (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) sd JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SUDHIR KUMAR 2025.06.18 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document