Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110745-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21655 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajiv Agrawal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Prakash Paul,Brij Bhushan Paul Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ishan Deo Giri Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard Shri A.P. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Shri S.C. Dwivedi, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent no.2-U.P. Expressway Industrial Development Authority (UPEIDA) to decide the representation/ objection of the petitioner dated 12.06.2024 and 04.07.2024 within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have vehemently opposed the writ petition. He submits that under the present facts and circumstances, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance upon the judgments in Rakesh Kumari v. State of U.P. & Ors., Misc. Bench No.19406 of 2019 dated 18.07.2019; Dinesh Prasad Mishra v. State of U.P. & Ors., Writ-C No.2161 of 2023 dated 04.04.2023 and Ashok Kumar Shukla & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors., Writ-C No.43185 of 2024 dated 05.02.2025. 4. After the matter has been heard at some length and the Court has proceeded to indicate its mind in negative, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that he is not inclined to press the writ petition. However, he states that liberty may be accorded to the petitioner to institute the civil proceeding in accordance with law. 5. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 SP/ Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad