S.No. 35 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 905/2025 CM(2385/2025) BILAL AHMAD WANI …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Wani, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT / SMC) ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,JUDGE ORDER 28-04-2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for a while, submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law within some reasonable time frame. 2. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, on the asking of the Court, enters appearance on behalf of the respondents and submits that he is not averse to the disposal of the present petition at this stage or else to the prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner. He, however, submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field. 3. With the consent of the learned appearing counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage and is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law within a period of four weeks, from the date a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures as also a copy of this order is made available to the respondents. Needless to say, the consideration order which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post. 4. Writ petition disposed of along with connected CM in the manner as indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 28-04-2025 Mubashir