Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70621 (ALL)

MEVARAM AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIB/2497/2025 · 2025-08-04

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131214 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 2497 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mevaram And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Rathore,Sanjeev Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Avinash Chandra Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Shri Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Rakesh Kumar Rathore, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Rohit Singh Parmar, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the Goan Sabha and learned Standing Counsel for the State are present. Shri Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Rakesh Kumar Rathore, learned counsel for the petitioners claims that the application for interim relief filed by the petitioner along with the application under Section 12 of the U.P.CH. Act be decided within a reasonable period of time. Shri Rohit Singh Parmar, learned counsel holding brief of Shri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the Goan Sabha and learned Standing Counsel for the State fairly submit that the matter is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In wake of the aforesaid submissions the respondents shall decide the representation of the petitioners regarding interim relief in accordance with law preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad