SHESHNATH VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/27093/2025 · 2025-08-11
Prakash Padia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 70619 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136572 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27093 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sheshnath Vishwakarma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
1. Heard Shri Aditya Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Shri Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.7.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondent.
3. The petitioner is a complainant. He made a complaint against the sitting Gram Pradhan of the village. On the basis of complaint the Block Development Officer, Gagaha, District Gorakhpur appointed two Members Inquiry Committee vide letter dated
14.02.2025.
4. It is argued that though considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no decisions has been taken, hence the present writ petition.
5. On the other hand, it is argued by the learned Standing Counsel that Respondent No.2 will take a decision in the matter, expeditiously.
6. Heard counsel for the parties.
7. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally directing the Respondent No.2/District Magistrate, District Gorakhpur to conclude the proceedings initiated on the complaint made by the petitioner, expeditiously. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Swati Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad