- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44930 CP No. 346 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL PETITION NO. 346 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. DHANUSHREE B, W/O HARISHA N, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 235, 3RD CROSS, VAJPAYEENAGAR, KEMPUDOMMASANDRA CROSS, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT – 562 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA N., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. HARISHA N, S/O M.V.NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT MYLANDAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 125. …RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC., PRAYING TO WITHDRAW M.C.NO.52/2025 FROM THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MALUR AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, FOR DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44930 CP No. 346 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Civil Petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is filed with the following prayers: "a) Withdraw M.C.No.52/2025 from the Court of the Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Malur; and b) Transfer the same to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Anekal, Bangalore Rural District, for disposal in accordance with law; and c) Pass such other order/s as deemed fit, including interim stay of proceedings in M.C.No.52/2025 pending disposal of this petition." 2. Heard Sri.Ananda N, learned counsel for the petitioner. This Court did not deem fit to issue notice to the respondent. 3. Facts in nutshell which are utmost necessary for disposal of the present petition are as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44930 CP No. 346 of 2025 (a) Respondent-husband has filed petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking restitution of conjugal rights. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is residing in Anekal and is unable to attend Malur for effectively participating in the matrimonial case on account of financial difficulty and geographical distance. (b) Further Sri.Ananda N, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to join the respondent. 4. Geographical distance and financial incapacity are no longer good grounds to transfer a case from one Court to another in view of the video conferencing facility. 5. If the petitioner is willing to join the husband, she can go to the Malur Court on the next date of hearing and express her willingness so that necessary orders would be passed by the learned trial Judge. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44930 CP No. 346 of 2025 6. She may also do so by appearing through video conferencing and necessary orders would be passed. 7. If any such request is made by the petitioner before the Court at Malur, the learned Trial Judge shall permit the petitioner to appear through video conferencing. 8. With that observation, the following: ORDER Civil Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 CT:SS