JOGINDER SINGH AND ORS v. IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHAN AND ORS
WP(C)/985/2023 · 2025-06-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7060 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7060 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 60 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 985/2023 CM(2336/2023) Joginder Singh & Ors. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Iftikhar Ahmad Khan & Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. N. H. Shah, Senior Advocate with Ms. Saima Ghulam, Advocate.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 02.06.2025
01. The record reveals that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners for the three consecutive hearings.
02. Today, when the instant matter was taken up for
consideration, there was once again no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the present writ petition. May be the cause of action for which the instant writ petition was filed, no longer survives or may have been redressed by this point of time, which could be the reason that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge SRINAGAR: 02.06.2025
“HAMID”