Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70577 (ORI)

RADHA MOHAN SUNANI v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/11674/2025 · 2025-10-15

V Narasingh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.11674 of 2025 1.Radha Mohan Sunani 2.Mukesh Sunanee @ Muna Sunani 3.Purnachandra Sunani @ Kalia Sunani 4.Dhanapati Sunani 5.Manoj Sunani @ Mana Sunani 6.Tarakanti Podh @ Tara Podh …. Petitioners Mr. M. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 15.10.2025 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R Case No.365 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Titilagarh, arising out of Titilagarh P.S. Case No.266 of 2025 for commission of offence under Sections 126(2)/ 296/ 351(3)/ 109(1)/ 115(2)/74/3(5) of BNS. p. 2 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that omnibus allegations have been made against the Petitioners. Hence, they may be protected by pre- arrest bail. 4. Such submission is opposed by the learned counsel for the State indicating that in the case at hand there are five injured persons and some of them have suffered injuries on the vital parts of the body and they have attributed to the Petitioners. 5. Taking into account the manner in which the incident happened, this Court is not persuaded to grant pre-arrest bail to Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and 5. 6. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail in respect of Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and 5 stands rejected. However, in the event the Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 and 5 surrender before the learned Court in seisin in the aforesaid case and move an application for their release on bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit. 7. So far as the prayer for pre-arrest bail of Petitioner No.4 who is 63 years old and Petitioner No.6 who is a lady, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner Nos.4 and 6 shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper. 8. It is needless to state that the Petitioner Nos.4 and 6 shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. p. 3 9. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Judge PKS