Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70575 (ALL)

SATYA NARAYAN TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8822/2025 · 2025-07-06

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105879 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8822 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satya Narayan Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh,Vikas Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner, who is working as Sub Inspector in the State Police, has challenged the order dated 15.06.2025, whereby, he has been transferred from district Mahoba to district Lucknow. The plea taken is that as per the transfer policy, an employee who is to retire within two years of time should be posted at a station of his choice in nearby district and hence, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner should have been transferred in nearby district instead of Lucknow. Learned Standing Counsel submits that since petitioner has already moved representation before the competent authority on 24.06.2025, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure No. 3 to the petition that may be directed to be disposed of in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioner raised in his representation and decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 IrfanUddin Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad