Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:18694
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP(227) No. 130 of 2021 • Ghanshyam Das Gangwani S/o Late Shri Wadhumal Aged About 76 Years By Profession Advocate, R/o Opposite Laxmi Talkies Gandhi Chowk Main Road Juna Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
... Petitioner Versus
1. Ramkishor Gupta S/o Late Shri Blaram Prasad Gupta Aged About 59 Years Civil Contractor R/o Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Balram Prasad Gupta, Died Through Lrs. 2.1 - (A) Radha Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2.2 - (B) Ganeshi @ Keshar Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 2.3 - (C) Shail Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2.4 - (D) Ahilya Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2.5 - (E) Anjani Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), 2.6 - (F) Aditi Gupta D/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 2.7 - (G) Sarasvati Devi Gupta W/o Late Balram Prasad Gupta R/o Through Ramkishor Gupta, Civil Contractor, R/o Kila Ward No. 26, Now Ward No. 35, Devangan Mohalla, Near Hariram Bheekhamshah House Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2
3.
Smt. Saroj Bai Gupta W/o Late Gajadhar Prasad Gupta Aged About 61 Years R/o Village Guma, Post Office Bitkuli, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), Presently R/o Through Kamalnarayan Gupta, Village And Post Office Khauna Via Silyari, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
4. Ratanpuriha Kashaudhan Vaishya Samaj Bilaspur Nagar Kila Ward Juna Bilaspur, House No. 27/292, Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Through Its President
5. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24/04/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of the case, from the Court below. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court be kindly be pleased to set aside the order impugned, passed vide ANNEXURE P-1, vide Order 27.01.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Vth ADJ Bilaspur, thereby the two application submitted by the Plaintiff herein the Petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 & under Order 07 Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, have been rejected, and further be pleased to direct the Court below to permit the Plaintiff to incorporate the proposed amendment as sought by the plaintiff herein the Petitioner, and further also be pleased to direct the Court below to take the additional documents filed by the Plaintiff, in the record of the case. 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may also be granted in the favour of the petitioners and against the Respondents.”
2. As per office report, the Civil Suit bearing No. 146-A/2014 has already been decided on 30.09.2021 by the Vth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.), therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti