Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50016 WP No. 8469 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 8469 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SATHYAVATHI W/O LATE K. VITTAL RAO AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 2. VINOD S/O LATE K. VITTAL RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3. SANTHOSH S/O LATE K VITTAL RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 4. ANITHA D/O LATE K. VITTAL RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 5. SANGEETHA D/O LATE K. VITTAL RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT SILVER OAK RANCH ESTATE RAAGAWAN PALYA, GOTTIGERE POST, KANAKAPURA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 083. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.K. MITHUN, ADV., FPR P-1 TO P-5)
AND:
1. KASHINATH RAO SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.,
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50016 WP No. 8469 of 2021
a.
SAKKU BAI, W/O LATE KASHINATH RAO SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRs 1b & 1c. b.
HEERA BAI D/O LATE KASHINATH RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. c.
RAMACHANDRA RAO S/O LATE KASHINATH RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.8, 2ND CROSS CO-OP COLONY, KRISHNAGIRI TOWN DHARMAPURI DIST, TAMIL NADU - 635 002. 2. K. SUBRAMANI RAO SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRs
a. RAJINI W/O LATE K. SUBRAMANI RAO AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. b. HEMANTH S/O LATE K. SUBRAMANI RAO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. c. KETHAN S/O LATE K. SUBRAMANI RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT NO. D-3 SWAMINATHAN STREET EKAT THAGAL CHENNAI - 600 097. 3. GANESH RAO S/O LATE R. KUPPAJI RAO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 40 9TH CROSS, 5TH WARD VSR LAYOUT, UDAYNAGAR
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50016 WP No. 8469 of 2021
TIN FACTORY, BENGALURU - 560 016. 4. K. GAYATHRI D/O LATE KASHINATH RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
5. K. SAVITHRI D/O LATE KASHINATH RAO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. 6. K. MEERA BAI D/O LATE KASHINATH RAO AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO. 8 TO 10 ARE RESIDING AT NO.13 1ST 'F' CROSS, YELLAMMAN KOIL STREET, ULSOOR BENGALURU - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI H.S. RUKKOJI RAO, ADV.
FOR R-C;
(BUT GPA COPY NOT FURNISHED ON BEHALF OF R-1(c) A/W VK) SRI S. MRUTHYUNAJAYA, ADV., FOR R-2(a TO c) SRI S. VASANTH MADHAV, ADV., R-1(b)(NOC) SMT. B.R. VIJAYA PRAKASH, ADV., FOR R-3;
V/O DTD:11.12.2022 R/(a) IS EXPIRED & R-1(b & c) ARE THE LRs; R-4 TO R-6 SERVED)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ORDER, DATED 9.07.2020, PASSED ON I.A.10, FILED U/OR. XX RULE 18(1) OF CPC, 1908 IN FDP NO.25035/2011, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-58), MAYOHALL UNIT, BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50016 WP No. 8469 of 2021
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned Counsel appearing for both the parties submit that in view of the
order of even date passed in W.P.No.8462/2021, no separate order is required in this writ petition.
2. Recording the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is also dismissed in terms of the order of even date passed in W.P.No.8462/2021.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
KK