- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44761 MSA No. 60 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2024 (LA) BETWEEN: RANGEGOWDA DEAD BY LRS 1. SHESHAMMA W/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS 2. D R JAYAKUMAR S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. D R MOHAN KUMAR S/O LATE RANGEGOWDA ALL ARE R/AT DASSURU VILLAGE SALAGAME HOBLI HASSAN TALUK 573201 …APPELLANTS (BY SMT. SHARADAMBA A.R., ADVOCATE) AND: THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, H R P 2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, 1ST FLOOR HASSAN - 573 201 …RESPONDENT THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2019 Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44761 MSA No. 60 of 2024 PASSED IN LAC (APPEAL) NO.346/2017 ON THE FILE OF 5TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.08.2005 PASSED IN LAC NO.147/2000 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN), HASSAN., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITIONERS FILED UNDER SEC.18(1) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants prays for time. 2. Order sheet dated 29.10.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the appellants sought for pass over of the matter in the morning session. Hence, the matter was passed over. When the matter is again called out, there was no representation. The appeal is listed for seventh time for compliance of office objections. However, the same is not complied with. The order sheet dated 05.12.2024 reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44761 MSA No. 60 of 2024 "Finally, two week's time is granted to comply the office objections, failing which, the appeal would stand dismissed." Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. Even though, I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter, to afford one more opportunity, list on 05.11.2025." 3. The matter is listed for eighth time for compliance of office objections. Still, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default i.e., for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE PNV CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20