LAXMAN SHIVRAM BHALERAO, SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS L.RS, 1. SMT. VENUBAI LAXMAN BHALERAO AND ORS v. SUKHDEO MAHADEV BHALERAO, SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS L.RS, 1. MADHUKAR S/O SUKHDEV BHALERAO AND ORS
CA/7478/2024 · 2025-07-23
Shri R M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7055 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7055 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
939-CA-7478-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7478 OF 2024 IN SAST/2245/2024 Laxman Shivram Bhalerao, Since Deceased Through His L.rs, 1. Smt. Venubai Laxman Bhalerao And Ors VERSUS Sukhdeo Mahadev Bhalerao, Since Deceased Through His L.rs, 1. Madhukar S/o Sukhdev Bhalerao And Ors *** • Mr. G. B. Rajale, Advocate for the Applicants • Mr. K. N. Shermale, Advocate for the Respondents ***
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : JULY 23, 2025 PER COURT :
1. This Application is filed for condonation of delay of 18 days in filing Second Appeal taking exception to the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 passed in RCA No. 109/2014.
2. Perused Application.
3. It is the case of the Applicants that they are agriculturist by occupation and have no other source of income than the agriculture. It is claimed that due to financial constraints, the Appeal could not be filed within a period of limitation. Hence, delay is sought to be condoned. Umesh PAGE 1 OF 2 2025:BHC-AUG:19232
939-CA-7478-2024.odt
4.
Learned Counsel for Respondents vehemently opposed the Application.
5. Perusal of the Application indicates that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. No mala fides can be attributed to the Appellants for not preferring Appeal in time. Hence, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Delay stands condoned. Appeal be registered.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 2 OF 2