Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70545 (PAT)

Ms. Fauzia Tabassum v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/12992/2016 · 2025-01-31

Smt G Anupama Chakravarthy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12992 of 2016 ====================================================== Ms. Fauzia Tabassum daughter of Md. Sayed Uddin resident of Old Azimabad Colony, P.S. Sultanganj, District Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional-Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Road Construction, Department, 3. Superintending Engineer,Central Circle, Road Construction Department, Bi- har, Patna 4. Assistant Engineer, Patna City, Road Division, Gulzarbagh, Patna 5. The Collector, Patna 6. The Senior Deputy Collector, General Section, Collectorate, Patna 7. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Registered through the Se- nior Regional Manager Retail ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amit Prakash- GA-13 For the State : Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, AC to GA-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 9 31-01-2025 1. On 04.10.2024, at the request of the Learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed on 06.12.2024 with a rider that no further adjournment shall be granted. 2. On 06.12.2024, the Learned counsel for the petitioner again sought for adjournment and the case was adjourned on payment of cost of Rs. 100/- (one Patna High Court CWJC No.12992 of 2016(9) dt.31-01-2025 2/2 hundred only) to the Bihar State Legal Services Authority. 3. The office notes dated 30.01.2025 disclose that receipt of payment of Rs. 100/- (one hundred only) to the Bihar State Legal Services Authority has not been filed as yet. 4. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner, therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution Manish/- (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) U