Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70544 (KAR)

H.S.PUNDARAIKA v. THE MANAGER

WP/37188/2025 · 2025-12-10

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52680 WP No. 37188 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 37188 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: H.S.PUNDARAIKA W/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS, HALUVALLI, R/AT KODIGE HITLU, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT- 577 101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH B BALADARE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGER CANARA BANK, KALASA BRANCH, MAIN ROAD KALASA, MUDIGERE TALUK, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52680 WP No. 37188 of 2025 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101. AND ALSO AT THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, VIDHYANAGAR BRANCH DAVANGERE …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. NATASHA N MURTHY, ADVOCATE) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ANNEXURE -C THAT IS THE SALE NOTICE DATED 31-10-2025 FOR E- AUCTION OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY SCHEDULED ON 10-12-2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK I.E., THE MANAGER, VIDHYNAGAR, DAVANAGERE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52680 WP No. 37188 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: "PRAYER Wherefore the petitioner respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to a) Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, directions or order quashing the Annexure 'C' that is the Sale notice dated 31-10-2025 for E-auction of immovable property scheduled on 10-12-2025 issued by the Respondent Bank i.e., The Manager, Vidhynagar, Davanagere in the interest of justice and equity insofar as petitioner is consent. b) Grant such others relief's as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Learned counsel for the respondent/Bank submits that the auction could not be conducted and the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57