CRWP-6500 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 122 Harpreet Kumar and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they wishes of their family members. 2. the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Barnala is directed to look into the representation dated 5), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. and their dates of birth are copies of their respectively. They got married is enclosed with 6500-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Harpreet Kumar and another Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. A.S.Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioners. CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Superintendent of Police, District Barnala is directed to look into the representation dated ), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both t and their dates of birth are 20.03.1987 and 01.04.20 copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P respectively. They got married on 16.06.2025 is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P- -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6500-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 19.06.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private have attained majority and married against the Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Superintendent of Police, District Barnala i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P- ), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major .1987 and 01.04.2000 respectively. The cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, 16.06.2025 and the Marriage Certificate -3. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.06.19 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6500 4. 5. Punjab, accepts notice objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. the petitioners and without going into the merits of their clai petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. representation expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regard in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency 19.06.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable 6500-2025 Notice of motion. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their clai petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No. representation dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P expeditiously, in accordance with law. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regard in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No -2- Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-5) and decide the same is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.06.19 13:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.