Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70535 (ALL)

DEENE ALIAS DEENANATH v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/23312/2025 · 2025-07-14

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:114802 Court No. - 68 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23312 of 2025 Applicant :- Deene Alias Deenanath Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- B.N.Singh,Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ramesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.1950 of 2015, under Sections-147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Orai, District-Jalaun, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case on the basis of general allegation of causing injuries to the injured. He further submitted that the co-accused Jaggu @ Jhagaru @ Vivek Kumar has already been granted bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10980 of 2025 vide order dated 11.04.2025, copy of the order has been annexed as annexure no. 10 of the affidavit. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case in the year, 2023, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. He further submitted that the applicant has criminal history of one case which has been explained in paragraph nos.20 of the affidavit. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 11.06.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Deene Alias Deenanath involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Manoj Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad