Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70532 (KAR)

SRI.A.S.SHANKARANARAYANA SETTY v. SRI. S.VENKATESH

WP/10680/2020 · 2025-11-18

S Vishwajith Shetty

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47471 WP No. 10680 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 10680 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI A.S. SHANKARANARAYANA SETTY S/O A. SUBBAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/AT NO.55, 2ND MAIN CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE - 560 018. …PETITIONER (BY SRI V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADV.) AND: 1. SRI. S.VENKATESH S/O LATE SIDDAPPA SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRs 1a. SMT. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. 1b. SMT. SHANTHI V D/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 1c. SMT. PARUATHI D/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARA. 1d. SRI SIDHARAJU S/O LATE VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. 1e. SRI SRINIVAS V S/O LATE VENKATESH Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47471 WP No. 10680 of 2020 AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.409 VALAGERAHALLI PALYA KHB COLONY, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU - 560 060. 2. SMT. KAMALA LAKSHMAN RAO NAYAK W/O LAKSHMAN RAO NAYAK AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT NO.258, 7TH MAIN RPC LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE VIJAYANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SIDDESHA L, ADV.) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.6.1.2020 IN O.S.NO.6372/2014 PASSED BY THE 42TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE IN SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION ON IA NO.4 AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Counsel for the respondents submits that O.S.No.6372/2014, out of which, this writ petition arises, has been disposed of, and therefore, this writ petition will not survive for consideration. He has placed on record the copy of the judgment and decree dated 03.11.2025 passed in O.S.No.6372/2014. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47471 WP No. 10680 of 2020 2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KK