Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70525 (ALL)

ANKUR PATHAK (BUNTY) MINOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/13999/2025 · 2025-07-06

Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:105937-DB Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13999 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ankur Pathak (Bunty) Minor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Sri K.K. Singh, Advocate filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the informant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State-respondents and Sri K.K. Singh, learned counsel for informant. 3. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 12.6.2025 registered as Case Crime No.0068 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(2), 191(3), 109 and 190 of BNS-2023, at Police Station Baburi, District Chandauli, and a direction to the respondent authorities not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report. 4. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. submits that a cognizable offence has been made out and, therefore, no interference is warranted in the impugned first information report. 6. Perusal of the impugned first information report prima facie reveals commission of cognizable offence. 7. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and others vs. Bhajan Lal and others, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 and M/s Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2021 SC 1918 and in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.3262/2021 (Leelavati Devi @ Leelawati & another vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh) decided on 07.10.2021, no case has been made out for interference with the impugned first information report. 8. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open for the petitioner to apply before the competent court for anticipatory bail/bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law. Order Date :- 7.7.2025/Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad