IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CRM-M-32779-2025 Date of decision: 19.06.2025 VINOD KUMAR ..Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) 1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in a criminal case arising from FIR No.127, dated 15.04.2022, registered under Section 20B-II(b) of NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Bawal, District Rewari. 2. On 15.04.2022, 10kg and 250 grams ‘Ganja’ was recovered from Dharmender and Anshu. On 16.04.2022, i.e. the very next day of the arrest, Dharmender disclosed that he has purchased the contraband from the petitioner. 3. Hence, the petitioner was nominated as an accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a discrepancy in the disclosure statement of Dharmender and Anshu and both these accused have been granted concession of bail. 4. This Court has considered the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Both Anshu and Dharmender were granted regular bail after custodial interrogation. Moreover, in the case of contrabands, in order to unearth the entire chain of supply proper investigation is required to be MOHD AYUB 2025.06.19 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-32779-2025 -2- carried out by the investigating agency in order to curb the menace caused by the drug. 6. Hence no ground to grant concession of bail is made out. 7. Dismissed. June 19th, 2025 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.06.19 16:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.