Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 70513 (KAR)

THIPESHA v. SMT SANNAERAMMA

RSA/602/2023 · 2025-09-24

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38494 RSA No. 602 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 602 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: THIPESHA S/O SIDDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/A ASHOKANAGARA, BIRUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 116. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHEKAR L S.,ADVOCATE) AND: SMT SANNAERAMMA W/O SANNAERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A ASHOKANAGARA, BIRUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 116. …RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.11.2022 PASSED IN RA No.97/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE (DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE) FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.11.2020 PASSED IN O.S.NO.9/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KADUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:38494 RSA No. 602 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The under signed most respectfully submit that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and as such the present Regular Second Appeal may be dismissed as not pressed in the best interests of equity, justice and law.” 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the above memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30